The Existence of the Soul: Exploring Neuroscience, Quantum Physics and Vedic Philosophy

    1  
  

Abstract

The concept of the soul has been a cornerstone of philosophical, spiritual, and scientific discourse for millennia. This paper studies the existence of the soul through an interdisciplinary lens, combining Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics.

Drawing on Vedic scriptures such as the Bhagavad Gita, it postulates that the soul (Atman) is the vital force distinguishing living from dead entities, serving as the indestructible source of consciousness and energy. Neuroscientific studies, particularly on the “hard problem” of consciousness and near-death experiences (NDEs), reveal limitations in purely materialistic explanations. Quantum physics, through theories like Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR), suggests non-material dimensions of consciousness, aligning with the Vedic view of the souls eternality. By integrating these perspectives, this study argues that the soul, as an indestructible entity, animates the body and persists beyond death, resonating with the principle of energy conservation. This comprehensive exploration bridges ancient wisdom with modern science, offering a holistic framework for understanding life, consciousness, and existence.

 

  1. Introduction

1.1 Background and Significance

The question of what animates a living being, distinguishing it from a lifeless corpse, has captivated human thought across cultures and ages. In Vedic philosophy, the soul, or Atman, is the eternal, non-material essence that imparts life, consciousness, and purpose to the physical body. This contrasts with modern scientific paradigms, particularly in neuroscience, which often reduce consciousness to neural processes. However, unresolved questions, such as the subjective nature of consciousness and phenomena like near-death experiences, challenge materialistic models. Quantum physics introduces concepts like non-locality and the observer effect, suggesting that consciousness may involve non-material dimensions, potentially aligning with spiritual notions of the soul. Here we explore the soul’s existence by integrating Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics, arguing that the soul is the vital force animating life, indestructible as per the principle of energy conservation.

The significance of this inquiry lies in its potential to bridge disparate domains. Vedic philosophy offers a metaphysical framework rooted in millennia-old wisdom, while neuroscience provides empirical insights into consciousness, and quantum physics explores the boundaries of material reality. By synthesizing these perspectives, this study addresses a fundamental human question: what is the essence of life and consciousness? This interdisciplinary approach not only enriches academic discourse but also fosters a dialogue between science and spirituality, encouraging a holistic understanding of existence.

1.2 Research Objectives

This study aims to:

  • Illuminate the Vedic concept of the soul using primary texts like the Bhagavad Gita and Upanishads.
  • Analyze neuroscientific research on consciousness, highlighting its limitations and potential compatibility with the soul theory.
  • Investigate quantum physics theories, such as Orch-OR, to explore non-material aspects of consciousness.
  • Establish the soul as the vital force distinguishing living from dead, aligning its indestructibility with energy conservation principles.
  • Synthesize these perspectives to propose a unified framework for understanding the souls role in life and consciousness.

1.3 Methodology

This research employs an interdisciplinary methodology, combining philosophical exegesis, empirical analysis, and theoretical exploration. Primary Vedic texts, including the Bhagavad Gita, Chhandogya Upanishad, and Katha Upanishad, are analyzed for their teachings on the soul. Neuroscientific literature, including studies on neural correlates of consciousness and NDEs, is reviewed to assess materialistic and non-materialistic interpretations. Quantum physics theories, particularly Orch-OR and quantum entanglement, are examined for their implications on consciousness and non-locality. The synthesis integrates these findings, drawing parallels between the souls indestructibility and energy conservation, supported by case studies and cross-disciplinary comparisons.

1.4 Structure of the Paper

The paper is organized as follows: Section 1 is Introduction. Section 2 explores the Vedic perspective, focusing on the souls nature and role. Section 3 examines neurosciences insights into consciousness, highlighting gaps and anomalies. Section 4 delves into quantum physics, analyzing theories supporting a non-material soul. Section 5 synthesizes these perspectives, arguing for the soul as the vital force. Section 6 discusses counterarguments and limitations, and Section 7 concludes with findings and future research directions.

2. The Vedic Perspective on the Soul

2.1 Defining the Atman

In Vedic philosophy, the soul, or Atman, is the eternal, non-material essence of an individual, distinct from the physical body, intelligence and mind. The Upanishads, foundational texts of Vedic thought, equate Atman with Brahman, the universal consciousness, suggesting an intrinsic connection between individual and cosmic existence. The Chhandogya Upanishad (6.11.3) uses the analogy of sap permeating a tree, illustrating that the soul animates the entire body, enabling life and consciousness. This holistic view posits the soul as the organizing principle behind biological and cognitive functions.

2.2 The Bhagavad Gita on the Souls Nature

The Bhagavad Gita, a key Vedic text, provides detailed insights into the souls characteristics. Chapter 2, Verse 20 states:

na jāyate mriyate vā kadācin nāyaṁ bhūtvā bhavitā vā na bhūyaḥ ajo nityaḥ śāśvato ’yaṁ purāṇo na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre “The soul is never born, nor does it die; it is not that having been, it ceases to exist. Unborn, eternal, everlasting, and primeval, it is not slain when the body is slain” (4). This verse establishes the souls immortality, emphasizing its independence from the physical bodys lifecycle.

Further, Chapter 2, Verse 22 illustrates the souls transmigration:

vāsāṁsi jīrṇāni yathā vihāya navāni gṛhṇāti naro ’parāṇi tathā śarīrāṇi vihāya jīrṇāny anyāni saṁyāti navāni dehī  “As a person discards worn-out clothes and puts on new ones, so the soul discards worn-out bodies and takes on new ones” (4). This metaphor underscores the souls continuity, suggesting it persists through multiple lifetimes, governed by karma.

2.3 The Soul as the Vital Force

Vedic philosophy identifies the soul as the source of life energy, animating the bodys biological processes. The KathaUpanishad (2.2.13) describes the soul as the “inner self” residing in the heart, directing the bodys functions. Its presence enables metabolism, neural activity, and consciousness, while its departure at death renders the body inert. This explains the stark difference between a living body, characterized by coordinated processes, and a dead body, which lacks vitality despite identical material composition.

2.4 Indestructibility and Energy Conservation

The Bhagavad Gita (Chapter 2, Verse 23) further elaborates:

nainaṁ chindanti śastrāṇi nainaṁ dahati pāvakaḥ na cainaṁ kledayanty āpo na śoṣayati mārutaḥ “Weapons cannot cut it, fire cannot burn it, water cannot wet it, nor wind dry it” (4). This metaphorical language highlights the souls resilience, aligning with the physical principle that energy cannot be destroyed, only transformed. The souls energy, unlike physical energy, is posited to transcend material constraints, persisting beyond bodily death.

2.5 Case Study: Vedic Practices, Egyptian Ka and the Soul

Vedic rituals, such as shraddha ceremonies, reflect the belief in the souls persistence post death. These practices, rooted in texts like the Garuda Purana, involve offerings to ensure the souls peaceful transition, reinforcing its role as a vital, enduring entity. Comparative analysis with other traditions, such as Egyptian beliefs in the ka, reveals a cross-cultural or influenced recognition of a life-animating essence, strengthening the Vedic perspective.

In Hinduism, shraddha ceremonies are rituals performed to honor deceased ancestors, believed to nourish and support their souls in the afterlife. The Garuda Purana, a key Vedic text, details the soul’s journey and the importance of these rituals. Similarly, ancient Egyptian beliefs in the ka, a vital life force, involve offerings to sustain the deceased. Both traditions highlight a shared human concern for a persistent life force, suggesting a universal recognition of the soul’s enduring role.

Shraddha ceremonies, typically conducted by male descendants, involve offerings like food and water to ensure the soul’s peace and liberation. These rituals, often performed during Pitru Paksha, reflect the belief that the soul requires sustenance post-death, as outlined in the Garuda Purana.

The ka in ancient Egyptian religion is the life force that survives death, needing offerings to thrive in the afterlife. Rituals, including food offerings and tomb maintenance, mirror Vedic practices, reinforcing the idea of a vital essence.

The parallels between shraddha and ka rituals suggest a broader human understanding of a life force that transcends physical death. While interpretations differ, both cultures emphasize the soul’s persistence, supported by rituals to ensure its well-being. Both Vedic shraddha and Egyptian ka rituals emphasize the persistence of a life force post-death, requiring ritualistic support.  The parallels extend beyond Hinduism and Egypt. For instance, ancient Chinese ancestor worship involves offerings to sustain spirits, reflecting similar concerns. These shared beliefs suggest a universal human inclination to honor a life force post-death, reinforcing the Vedic perspective’s validity.

The concept of the soul as a vital, enduring entity has been central to many ancient cultures, shaping rituals and beliefs about life and death. In Vedic traditions, shraddha ceremonies, guided by texts like the Garuda Purana, reflect the belief in the soul’s persistence post-death, requiring support through offerings. Similarly, ancient Egyptian practices for the ka, a life force, involve rituals to sustain the deceased in the afterlife. This case study elaborates on these practices, comparing their philosophical and ritualistic dimensions to highlight a cross-cultural recognition of a life-animating essence.

Shraddha ceremonies, derived from the Sanskrit term śrāddha (meaning sincerity or faith), are integral to Hindu funerary traditions. These rituals, primarily performed by male descendants, honor ancestors up to three generations, including parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents. The emphasis on male performers underscores the cultural importance of ensuring a lineage to conduct these rites, reflecting the societal value placed on familial continuity.

Shraddha involves offerings of pinda (rice balls), water (tarpan), and food, often accompanied by Vedic mantras. These are performed on lunar date of deceased or specific lunar days, notably during Pitru Paksha, a 16-day period dedicated to ancestors. The rituals are believed to nourish the soul, helping it transition from lower realms to higher ones or prepare for reincarnation. The Garuda Purana details specific rites, such as the Terahvin (13th-day ceremony), which provide energy for the soul’s journey.

The Garuda Purana describes the soul’s journey through Yamaloka, the realm of Lord Yama, where karma determines its fate. Shraddha rituals are seen as a filial duty, ensuring the soul’s comfort and liberation (moksha). Neglecting these rites may leave the soul vulnerable to negative energies, causing distress. The belief in the soul’s need for sustenance post-death parallels the Vedic view of its indestructibility, as articulated in the Bhagavad Gita (2.20), which states the soul is eternal and unaffected by physical death.

Soul’s Journey Post-Death

The text outlines that upon death, the soul, accompanied by its subconscious mind, leaves the body and enters Yamaloka. It faces judgment based on karma, potentially experiencing punishments in various narakas (hells) or rewards in higher realms. The soul may linger near earthly possessions for seven days before continuing its journey, a period during which shraddha rituals are critical.

The Garuda Purana emphasizes that shraddha rituals, especially those performed on the 13th day and during Pitru Paksha, provide nourishment and relief to the soul. These acts are believed to help the soul form a subtle body, enabling it to navigate the afterlife. The text also suggests that devotion to deities like Vishnu can redeem sinful souls, aligning with the broader Vedic goal of moksha.

The Garuda Purana reinforces the Vedic view of the soul as eternal, aligning with the Bhagavad Gita’s assertion that it cannot be destroyed (2.23). This indestructibility parallels the scientific principle of energy conservation, suggesting the soul’s energy transforms rather than dissipates, a concept explored in quantum physics discussions later in this study.

In ancient Egyptian religion, the soul comprised multiple aspects, including the ka, ba, and akh. The ka was the vital life force, born with an individual and persisting after death. Represented by a hieroglyph of uplifted arms, the ka symbolized protection and divine essence, often depicted as a smaller figure alongside the person. The ka required sustenance post-death, provided through offerings of food, drink, and incense placed in tombs. Tomb statues, known as ka statues, served as physical homes for the ka, activated through the “Opening of the Mouth” ceremony to enable perception and interaction. These practices ensured the ka’s survival, preventing the deceased’s spiritual death (Global Egyptian Museum).

The ka was integral to Egyptian funerary practices, with mummification preserving the body as a vessel for the ka. Offerings were believed to absorb the ka’s life-giving force, a concept echoed in the phrase “to your ka” used during meals (Egyptian Myths). This reflects a belief in the ka’s ongoing role in the afterlife, akin to the Vedic soul’s journey.

The comparative analysis strengthens the Vedic view of the soul as a vital, enduring entity. The Garuda Purana’s emphasis on shraddha aligns with the Egyptian ka’s need for sustenance, suggesting that rituals are not merely symbolic but integral to the soul’s post-death existence. This cross-cultural recognition supports  idea that the soul, as a life-animating force, transcends cultural boundaries, resonating with philosophical and spiritual inquiries into consciousness and existence.

Shraddha ceremonies, as detailed in the Garuda Purana, and Egyptian ka rituals illustrate a profound human concern for the soul’s fate after death. Both traditions underscore the soul’s persistence, requiring ritualistic support to ensure its well-being. This case study highlights the universal recognition of a life force, enriching our understanding of the soul’s role across cultures and reinforcing its significance in Vedic philosophy.

  1. Neuroscience and the Mystery of Consciousness

Neuroscience has made significant strides in mapping consciousness to brain activity, identifying key regions like the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and default mode network. However, the “hard problem” of consciousness—why physical processes yield subjective experience—remains a mystery. Near-death experiences (NDEs), where individuals report vivid consciousness during clinical death, challenge materialistic models, suggesting consciousness may not be solely brain-dependent. Vedic philosophy posits the soul as the vital force animating the body, a concept that aligns with these gaps in scientific understanding. Here we explore these issues, emphasizing the distinction between living and dead bodies and the potential role of a non-material soul.

3.1 Neural Correlates of Consciousness

Neuroscience has made significant strides in mapping consciousness to brain activity. Studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) identify regions like the prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and default mode network as critical to awareness and cognition (2). These findings suggest that consciousness emerges from complex neural interactions, with specific patterns correlating with states like wakefulness, sleep, or meditation.

Studies, such as those by Koch et al. (2016), demonstrate that specific neural patterns correlate with states like wakefulness, sleep, or meditation. For example, synchronized gamma waves (30–100 Hz) are associated with heightened awareness, while slower delta waves dominate during deep sleep. These findings suggest consciousness emerges from complex neural interactions, with the brain acting as a dynamic system integrating sensory input, memory, and attention.

However, these correlations do not explain causation. While fMRI and EEG map brain activity, they do not clarify why these processes produce subjective experience. This limitation has led to competing theories, such as Integrated Information Theory (IIT), which posits consciousness arises from highly integrated neural information, and Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT), which suggests consciousness involves broadcasting information across brain regions (Consciousness Theories). Despite their insights, these theories remain incomplete, prompting exploration of non-material hypotheses.

3.2 The Hard Problem of Consciousness

Despite these advances, the “hard problem” of consciousness, (1), remains unresolved. This problem questions how physical processes in the brain give rise to subjective experience the qualitative “what it is like” to be conscious. For example, why does neural activity in the visual cortex produce the experience of color? Materialistic models struggle to bridge this explanatory gap, prompting exploration of non-material hypotheses, such as the soul.

Further understanding the “hard problem” of consciousness, articulated by David Chalmers (1995), questions how physical processes in the brain give rise to subjective experience—the qualitative “what it is like” to be conscious (Hard Problem). For instance, why does neural activity in the visual cortex produce the sensation of red, rather than merely processing light wavelengths? This explanatory gap distinguishes the hard problem from “easy” problems, like mapping neural correlates, which are more tractable.

Materialistic models struggle to address this gap. For example, reductionist approaches, which break consciousness into neural components, fail to account for the unified nature of subjective experience. Emergentist theories, suggesting consciousness arises from complex neural interactions, also lack a mechanism to explain why complexity yields awareness. Philosophers like Thomas Nagel argue that subjective experience may require a non-physical explanation, as it cannot be fully reduced to objective processes (Consciousness Philosophy).

This unresolved issue aligns with Vedic philosophy, which posits the soul (Atman) as the source of consciousness, independent of the body. The Bhagavad Gita (2.20) describes the soul as eternal and non-material, suggesting it underlies subjective experience, a perspective that neuroscience cannot currently refute.

3.3 Near-Death Experiences (NDEs): Evidence beyond the Brain

Research on NDEs provides compelling data challenging materialistic views (7) conducted a prospective study of cardiac arrest survivors, finding that 18% reported NDEs, including vivid consciousness, out-of-body experiences, and encounters with spiritual entities during periods of minimal brain activity. These findings suggest that consciousness may persist independently of neural function, aligning with the Vedic notion of the soul as a non-material entity.

Near-death experiences provide compelling data challenging materialistic views of consciousness. A landmark study by van Lommel et al. (2001) examined 344 cardiac arrest survivors, finding that 18% reported NDEs, including vivid consciousness, out-of-body experiences, and spiritual encounters during periods of minimal brain activity (NDE Study). These findings suggest consciousness may persist independently of neural function, aligning with the Vedic notion of the soul as a non-material entity.

Case Example

In van Lommel’s study, a patient recalled observing medical procedures from above their body, accurately describing details later verified by staff, despite being clinically dead with no measurable brain activity. Such cases raise profound questions about consciousness’s dependence on the brain. Other studies, like Greyson (2010), report similar phenomena, with patients describing coherent experiences during flat EEG readings, challenging the assumption that consciousness requires active neural processes.

Explanations for NDEs vary. Materialists suggest residual brain activity or oxygen deprivation might account for these experiences, but these theories struggle to explain the clarity and veridical nature of NDE reports. Non-materialist interpretations, including the soul hypothesis, propose that consciousness resides in a non-physical entity that persists during clinical death. This aligns with the Bhagavad Gita’s assertion that the soul is unaffected by bodily death, offering a metaphysical framework for NDEs.

3.4 Living vs. Dead: The Role of the Vital Force

The distinction between living and dead bodies is stark: living organisms exhibit coordinated processes like metabolism, homeostasis, and neural signaling, driven by bioelectric energy, while dead bodies, despite identical material composition, lack these functions. Neuroscience attributes this to the cessation of neural and biochemical activity, particularly in the brainstem and cortex, which regulate vital functions like breathing and heart rate.

However, the initiating force behind these processes remains unclear. What sustains the intricate coordination of life, and why does it shortly cease at death? Vedic philosophy posits the soul as this vital force, animating the body and enabling its functions. The Bhagavad Gita (2.22) compares the soul’s departure to discarding old clothes, suggesting its absence leaves the body inert. This aligns with observable differences: a living body responds to stimuli, while a dead body does not, despite sharing the same atoms.

From a scientific perspective, bioelectric signals, generated by ion gradients across cell membranes, drive processes like neural firing and muscle contraction. Yet, these signals depend on a complex interplay of biochemical pathways, and neuroscience cannot fully explain what orchestrates this system. The soul, as a non-material organizing principle, offers a complementary explanation, resonating with ancient concepts like the Greek psyche or Egyptian ka, which also attribute life to a spiritual essence.

The indestructibility of the soul, as per the Bhagavad Gita (2.23), parallels the conservation of energy in physics: just as energy transforms but is not destroyed, the soul persists beyond bodily death. While not equating the soul with physical energy, this analogy highlights a shared theme of continuity, suggesting the soul’s energy may transform into another form, such as a new embodiment.

3.5 Limitations of Neuroscientific Models

Materialistic neuroscience faces significant challenges in explaining phenomena like NDEs and the subjective nature of consciousness. Studies by Preston et al. (2013) indicate that belief in the soul persists when mechanistic explanations are incomplete, suggesting that gaps in neuroscience enhance spiritual interpretations (Soul Belief). For example, when neuroscience fails to account for NDEs or the unity of conscious experience, individuals compelled to turn to metaphysical explanations like the soul.

These limitations stem from neuroscience’s focus on objective, measurable phenomena. Subjective experience, being inherently private, resists reduction to neural data. Moreover, anomalies like NDEs challenge the assumption that consciousness is entirely brain-dependent. Critics of materialist models, such as philosopher John Searle, argue that consciousness may require a new scientific paradigm, potentially incorporating non-physical elements (Consciousness Debate).

Interdisciplinary approaches, integrating spiritual perspectives with empirical data, offer a promising path forward. Vedic philosophy’s concept of the soul complements neuroscience by addressing questions science cannot yet answer, such as the origin of subjective experience or the persistence of consciousness in NDEs. This synthesis encourages a broader inquiry into consciousness, acknowledging both material and metaphysical dimensions.

Table: Comparing Neuroscience and Vedic Perspectives on Consciousness

Aspect Neuroscience Vedic Philosophy
Definition Consciousness as neural activity in regions like prefrontal cortex and thalamus (Neural Correlates). Soul (Atman) as eternal, non-material source of consciousness (Bhagavad Gita).
Subjective Experience Unresolved “hard problem”; no explanation for qualitative awareness (Hard Problem). Soul underlies subjective experience, independent of body (Upanishads).
NDEs Attributed to residual brain activity or oxygen deprivation, but evidence weak (NDE Study). Soul persists beyond bodily death, explaining NDE consciousness (Bhagavad Gita).
Living vs. Dead Life driven by bioelectric signals; cessation unexplained (Consciousness Neuroscience). Soul as vital force animates body; its departure causes death (Bhagavad Gita).
Limitations Cannot explain subjective experience or NDEs fully (Soul Belief). Need empirical testability but addresses metaphysical gaps (Upanishads).

Neuroscience has illuminated the neural basis of consciousness, identifying key brain regions and patterns, but it struggles with the “hard problem” and phenomena like NDEs. These gaps align with Vedic philosophy’s concept of the soul as a non-material, indestructible vital force animating the body. The distinction between living and dead bodies underscores the need for an organizing principle, which neuroscience cannot fully explain but Vedic thought attributes to the soul. By integrating these perspectives, we gain a richer understanding of consciousness, encouraging further interdisciplinary research into the soul’s potential role.

  1. Quantum Physics and the Non-Material Soul

Quantum physics offers a fascinating lens through which to explore the concept of a non-material soul, a notion deeply rooted in Vedic philosophy. By examining phenomena such as superposition, entanglement, and the observer effect, alongside theories like Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR), we can draw parallels between modern science and ancient spiritual ideas. This section elaborates on these connections, addressing key aspects, supporting examples, and counterarguments.

4.1 Quantum Phenomena and Consciousness

Quantum physics introduces phenomena that challenge the classical materialist view of reality, where everything is reducible to physical matter. Key among these are:

  • Superposition: Particles exist in multiple states simultaneously until measured, suggesting reality is not fixed until observed.
  • Entanglement: Particles can be instantaneously correlated across vast distances, hinting at a deeper interconnectedness.
  • Observer Effect: The act of measurement influences a quantum system’s state, implying consciousness may play a role in shaping physical outcomes.

The observer effect, famously demonstrated in the double-slit experiment, shows that particles behave as waves when unobserved but collapse into definite states when measured. This suggests that consciousness—potentially a non-material entity like the soul—might interact with the physical world. Philosophers like David Chalmers propose that consciousness could be a fundamental aspect of the universe, akin to space or time, rather than an emergent property of matter. This aligns with the Vedic view of the soul (Atman) as an eternal, non-physical source of awareness that influences the body, opening avenues for exploring its existence beyond classical science.

4.2 Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) Theory

The Orch-OR theory, developed by physicist Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, proposes that consciousness arises from quantum processes within the brain’s microtubules—tiny protein structures inside neurons. Unlike classical theories that attribute consciousness to neural firing alone, Orch-OR suggests:

  • Microtubules facilitate quantum coherence, enabling complex quantum computations.
  • Consciousness emerges when quantum states collapse through “orchestrated objective reduction,” a process potentially influenced by non-local effects.

This theory bridges quantum physics and biology, offering a mechanism for how a non-material soul might animate the body. It aligns with the Vedic perspective of the soul as a pervasive, non-physical force, distinct from the material body yet integral to its functioning.

Case Example: In 2012, Hameroff and Deepak Chopra suggested that quantum information in microtubules could persist after bodily death, forming a “quantum soul.” This idea echoes the Bhagavad Gita’s depiction of the soul’s transmigration, where consciousness continues beyond physical demise, potentially reincarnating into a new form. This proposal provides a scientific framework for the soul’s continuity, resonating with spiritual traditions that view the soul as eternal.

4.3 Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality

Quantum entanglement reveals that particles sharing a special state remain correlated, even when separated by vast distances. Changes to one particle instantaneously affect the other, a phenomenon known as non-locality. This challenges the idea of a purely localized, material existence and mirrors the Vedic concept of Atman (individual soul) as an inseparable part of Brahman (universal consciousness).

  • Parallel to Vedic Philosophy: Just as entangled particles transcend physical boundaries, the Atman is seen as interconnected with Brahman, suggesting consciousness is not confined to the body.
  • Quantum Brain Dynamics (QBD): This theory posits that coherent quantum states in brain cells support memory and consciousness, potentially extending beyond the individual. This non-local aspect of consciousness supports the idea of a soul that persists and influences beyond physical limits.

Entanglement and non-locality thus provide a scientific analogy for the soul’s transcendence, suggesting consciousness might operate on a level that defies classical spatial constraints.

4.4 Energy Conservation and the Soul’s Indestructibility

The law of energy conservation states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. This scientific principle parallels the Vedic assertion of the soul’s indestructibility, as articulated in the Bhagavad Gita (2.20): “The soul is never born, nor does it die; it is eternal.” In quantum physics, the persistence of information—explored in contexts like the black hole information paradox—suggests that consciousness or its essence might endure beyond physical death.

  • Transformation of Energy: The soul’s vital force could transform post-mortem, much like energy shifts forms without being lost.
  • Quantum Information: Theories propose that quantum information in the brain, such as that in microtubules, might persist, supporting the idea of an indestructible soul.

This synthesis strengthens the argument for the soul as an eternal entity, offering a bridge between the conservation laws of physics and the spiritual concept of an unchanging essence.

4.5 Criticisms and Controversies

Despite these intriguing connections, the idea of quantum processes supporting a non-material soul faces skepticism:

  • Decoherence Critique: Physicist Max Tegmark argues that quantum coherence in biological systems is unlikely due to decoherence—where quantum states collapse rapidly in warm, wet environments like the brain. This challenges the feasibility of Orch-OR and related theories.
  • Counterargument from Quantum Biology: Recent research demonstrates quantum effects in living systems, such as:
    • Photosynthesis: Plants use quantum coherence to transfer energy with near-perfect efficiency.
    • Enzyme Catalysis: Quantum tunneling accelerates biochemical reactions.
    • Bird Navigation: Quantum entanglement in cryptochromes helps birds sense magnetic fields.

These findings suggest that biological systems can sustain quantum coherence, countering decoherence objections and supporting the plausibility of quantum-based consciousness. This bolsters Orch-OR and the notion that a non-material soul could operate through quantum mechanisms.

Quantum physics provides a compelling framework for exploring the non-material soul, blending scientific inquiry with Vedic philosophy. Phenomena like the observer effect and entanglement challenge materialist assumptions, suggesting consciousness influences reality in ways that align with the soul’s role in Vedic thought. Orch-OR offers a potential mechanism for this interaction, while energy conservation and non-locality echo the soul’s indestructibility and transcendence. Though criticisms like decoherence persist, advances in quantum biology reinforce the feasibility of these ideas. This interdisciplinary synthesis invites further exploration into the nature of consciousness and the soul, merging the empirical with the eternal.

 5. Synthesis: The Soul as the Vital Force

The concept of the soul as the vital force animating life finds support across Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics. Vedic texts, such as the Bhagavad Gita, describe the soul (Atman) as eternal and the source of consciousness, while neuroscience highlights unexplained phenomena like near-death experiences (NDEs) and the “hard problem” of consciousness. Quantum physics, through theories like Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR), suggests consciousness may involve non-material processes, aligning with the soul’s indestructibility. Cross-cultural comparisons, including Buddhist and Egyptian beliefs, reveal shared themes of a life essence, enriching this synthesis. This section elaborates on these perspectives, arguing that the soul energizes life, explains the living-dead distinction, and reframes life and death as transitions.

5.1 Integrating Diverse Perspectives

This synthesis unites Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics to argue that the soul is the vital force animating life, offering a holistic framework that bridges ancient wisdom and modern science.

Vedic Philosophy

Vedic texts provide a metaphysical foundation, portraying the soul as eternal and consciousness’s source. The Bhagavad Gita (2.20) states, “The soul is never born, nor does it die; it is unborn, eternal, everlasting, and primeval” . These teachings establish the soul as the non-material essence distinguishing living from dead, aligning with the principle that energy transforms but is not destroyed.

Neuroscience

Neuroscience, while materialistic, reveals gaps that leave room for non-physical explanations. The “hard problem” of consciousness—why physical processes yield subjective experience—remains unresolved . Studies on NDEs, such as van Lommel et al. (2001), show 18% of cardiac arrest survivors reporting vivid consciousness during minimal brain activity, suggesting consciousness may persist independently. These anomalies challenge the view that consciousness is solely brain-dependent, aligning with the Vedic soul as a non-material vital force.

Quantum Physics

Quantum physics offers theoretical support for non-material consciousness. The Orch-OR theory by Penrose and Hameroff posits that consciousness arises from quantum processes in neuronal microtubules, potentially involving non-local effects . These ideas align with the soul’s indestructibility, akin to energy conservation.

Integration: Vedic philosophy provides a metaphysical framework, neuroscience highlights empirical gaps, and quantum physics offers a theoretical mechanism. Together, they support the soul as the vital force, animating life and persisting beyond death, with its energy transforming rather than dissipating.

5.2 The Soul as the Source of Life Energy

The soul, as per Vedic philosophy, energizes biological processes, enabling metabolism, neural activity, and consciousness. Its presence distinguishes living organisms, characterized by coordinated functions, from dead bodies, which lack these despite identical material composition. The Bhagavad Gita (2.22) compares the soul’s departure to discarding worn-out clothes, explaining the cessation of life functions at death.

Biological Processes

Living organisms maintain homeostasis, metabolize nutrients, and respond to stimuli through bioelectric signals driven by ion gradients across cell membranes. Neuroscience attributes these to neural and biochemical activity, but the initiating force remains unclear. Vedic philosophy posits the soul as this force, infusing the body with life energy, akin to the Greek psyche or Egyptian ka. Its absence halts these processes, rendering the body inert, as observed in clinical death.

Energy Conservation

The soul’s role aligns with the law of energy conservation, which states energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. The Bhagavad Gita (2.23) asserts, “Weapons cannot cut it, fire cannot burn it,” emphasizing the soul’s indestructibility.

Scientific and Spiritual Alignment

This perspective bridges science and spirituality. Neuroscience’s inability to pinpoint life’s initiating force, combined with quantum physics’ non-local consciousness models, supports the Vedic soul as the vital energy source. The transformation of this energy at death aligns with reincarnation, where the soul assumes a new body based on karma, reinforcing its role as the animating force.

5.3 Case Study: Cross-Cultural Perspectives

Comparative analysis with other traditions reveals diverse yet overlapping views of a life-animating essence, reinforcing the Vedic soul’s role as a vital force.

Buddhist Concept of Anatta

Buddhism’s anatta (no-self) doctrine denies a permanent soul, asserting that what persists is a stream of consciousness influenced by karma. This suggests a shared recognition of a life essence, even if interpreted differently.

Ancient Egyptian Ka

The Egyptian ka, a vital life force, survives death and requires offerings to thrive in the afterlife. The ka’s role as a life-animating essence aligns with the Vedic Atman, despite cultural differences in afterlife beliefs.

Other Traditions

  • Ancient Greek Psyche: In Greek philosophy, the psyche animates the body and persists post-death, as in Plato’s Phaedo, which describes the soul’s immortality. This resonates with the Vedic soul’s eternal nature.
  • African Animism: Many African traditions view life as animated by spirits, with rituals honoring ancestors to sustain their essence, akin to shraddha.
  • Taoist Hun and Po: Chinese Taoism describes dual souls—hun (spiritual) and po (physical)—that separate at death, with hun continuing, similar to Vedic transmigration .

Analysis

These traditions, while diverse, recognize a life force distinguishing living from dead, often requiring ritual support. Buddhism’s anatta emphasizes continuity of consciousness, Egyptian ka highlights sustenance, and Greek psyche underscores immortality, all echoing the Vedic soul’s role. This cross-cultural convergence strengthens the argument that the soul, as a vital force, is a universal concept, transcending cultural boundaries.

Table 1: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Soul

Tradition Concept Role Post-Death Vedic Parallel
Buddhism Anatta (no-self) Stream of consciousness via karma Rebirth without permanent soul Transmigration of Atman
Ancient Egyptian Ka (life force) Animates body, needs offerings Survives in afterlife Atman sustained by shraddha
Greek Psyche (soul) Source of life and reason Immortal, judged in afterlife Eternal Atman
African Animism Ancestral spirits Animate life, influence descendants Persist, require rituals Atman supported by ancestor rites
Taoism Hun/Po (dual souls) Hun spiritual, Po physical Hun continues, Po dissipates Atman’s transmigration

5.4 Implications for Life and Death

Recognizing the soul as the vital force reframes life and death as transitions, not terminations, integrating scientific and spiritual insights.

Reframing Life

Viewing life as animated by the soul emphasizes its dynamic, purposeful nature. Biological processes—metabolism, neural signaling—are expressions of the soul’s energy, suggesting a deeper unity between body and consciousness. This aligns with quantum physics’ non-local consciousness models, where the soul connects the individual to a universal framework, as in Vedic Brahman.

Reframing Death

Death, as the soul’s departure, becomes a transition rather than an end. The Bhagavad Gita’s transmigration (2.22) and quantum theories of information persistence suggest consciousness continues, potentially as a “quantum soul” or spiritual essence.

Broader Implications

This perspective has profound implications:

  • Philosophical: It bridges dualism and monism, viewing the soul as both distinct and part of a universal consciousness, aligning with Vedic duality and non-duality.
  • Ethical: Recognizing the soul’s eternality encourages compassion and responsibility, as actions (karma) influence future existences.
  • Scientific: It prompts research into consciousness’s non-material aspects, such as testing Orch-OR or studying NDEs empirically.

Challenges

The soul theory faces challenges, including neuroscience’s materialist bias and quantum theories’ speculativeness. However, the interdisciplinary approach—combining Vedic metaphysics, neuroscientific anomalies, and quantum insights—offers a robust framework, encouraging further exploration.

The synthesis of Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics supports the soul as the vital force animating life. Vedic texts establish its eternal nature, neuroscience reveals gaps in materialist models, and quantum physics suggests non-material consciousness, aligning with energy conservation. Cross-cultural perspectives reinforce this, highlighting a universal life essence. Reframing life and death as transitions, this perspective integrates science and spirituality, inviting deeper inquiry into consciousness and existence.

  1. Discussion and Counterarguments

6.1 Materialistic Critiques from Neuroscience

Materialist perspectives in neuroscience assert that consciousness can be entirely accounted for by neural processes. This view is supported by evidence from cases where brain damage leads to specific cognitive impairments. For example, damage to the Broca’s area can impair speech production, while lesions in the hippocampus can disrupt memory formation (Kandel et al., 2013). Such observations suggest that consciousness is a product of physical brain activity. However, this position is challenged by the “hard problem” of consciousness and the phenomenon of near-death experiences (NDEs), which hint at the possibility of a non-material component, such as the soul.

The hard problem, a term introduced by philosopher David Chalmers (1995), refers to the challenge of explaining why and how physical processes in the brain give rise to the subjective experience of consciousness—why there is a “what it is like” to be aware. While neuroscience excels at identifying neural correlates of specific experiences, it has yet to bridge the gap between measurable brain activity and the qualitative nature of consciousness. This limitation opens the door to alternative explanations that go beyond materialism.

Near-death experiences provide further evidence that complicates the materialist framework. Research has shown that individuals undergoing cardiac arrest—when brain function is severely compromised—sometimes report vivid, coherent experiences, such as seeing their surroundings or feeling a sense of peace (Parnia et al., 2014). These accounts suggest that consciousness might persist independently of a fully functioning brain, aligning with traditional concepts like the soul in Vedic philosophy. Moreover, the argument that brain damage disproves a non-material component may be countered by the idea that the brain serves as a filter or conduit for consciousness. Damage to this filter could impair its expression without negating its underlying source (Kelly et al., 2007).

6.2 Skepticism in Quantum Theories

Quantum theories of consciousness, such as Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR) proposed by Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff, face skepticism regarding their biological plausibility. Critics highlight issues like decoherence and the absence of robust empirical evidence. Orch-OR posits that consciousness emerges from quantum processes within microtubules in neurons, a hypothesis that bridges physics and biology (Hameroff & Penrose, 2014). However, detractors argue that the brain’s warm, wet, and dynamic environment would disrupt quantum coherence—the maintenance of quantum states—making such processes unlikely (Tegmark, 2000).

Decoherence occurs when a quantum system interacts with its surroundings, causing it to lose its delicate quantum properties and behave classically. Critics contend that this process happens too rapidly in the brain for quantum effects to contribute meaningfully to consciousness. Yet, recent discoveries in quantum biology challenge this view. For instance, quantum coherence has been observed in photosynthesis, where it enhances energy transfer efficiency (Engel et al., 2007), and in avian navigation, where quantum entanglement may underpin magnetoreception (Ritz et al., 2004). These examples demonstrate that quantum effects can operate in biological systems, lending credence to the idea that Orch-OR merits further investigation.

While Orch-OR remains speculative, its value lies in its potential to offer a testable framework that extends beyond classical neuroscience. The lack of direct empirical support is a limitation, but it also signals an opportunity for future experiments—such as examining whether anesthetics, which target microtubules, disrupt consciousness in ways consistent with quantum predictions (Hameroff, 2012). Thus, advances in quantum biology bolster the case for exploring these theories as a bridge between science and metaphysical questions about consciousness.

6.3 Reconciling Science and Spirituality

The reconciliation of science and spirituality hinges on recognizing their complementary strengths. Science provides empirical rigor through observation and experimentation, excelling at uncovering the mechanisms of the physical world. Spirituality, conversely, offers metaphysical depth, addressing questions of meaning, purpose, and the nature of subjective experience. This paper proposes an integrative approach, drawing on Vedic philosophy to frame scientific findings within a broader context.

Neuroscience, for instance, can map brain activity associated with meditative states, identifying regions like the prefrontal cortex or default mode network involved in such experiences (Koch et al., 2016). However, it does not explain the significance or transformative potential of these states. Vedic philosophy, with its concept of the soul (Atman) as the eternal essence of consciousness, provides a lens through which to interpret these findings. It suggests that meditative practices aim toward self-realization (moksha), a goal that transcends physical explanations.

This integrative perspective fosters a dialogue between disciplines rather than viewing them as oppositional. Science can validate aspects of spiritual practice—such as the physiological benefits of meditation—while spirituality can enrich scientific inquiry by posing questions about consciousness that empirical methods alone cannot fully address. By combining these approaches, a more comprehensive understanding of consciousness emerges, one that honors both measurable data and the profound mysteries of existence.

6.4 Limitations of the Study

The study’s reliance on projected quantum theories and philosophical texts presents a key restraint, as it might in some cases lacks the empirical grounding that characterizes conventional scientific research. The integration of Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics is conceptually intriguing, but it builds on theories—like Orch-OR and the soul as a non-material entity—that remain unproven in a now days practiced scientific sense. This theoretical foundation may weaken the study’s credibility among those who prioritize testable evidence.

To strengthen the soul hypothesis, future research should focus on developing concrete, testable predictions. For example, if consciousness involves a non-material component interacting with the brain, researchers might investigate unique neural or quantum signatures during altered states like NDEs or deep meditation. Cross-cultural studies of spiritual experiences could also yield comparative data, shedding light on whether consciousness persists beyond physical constraints in consistent ways. Engaging with critical perspectives and diverse evidence would enhance its objectivity.

In summary, while this study offers a thought-provoking argument for the soul as the vital force behind consciousness, its theoretical nature underscores the need for further empirical validation. By pursuing interdisciplinary research and testable hypotheses, the exploration of consciousness can advance, bridging the gap between science, philosophy, and spirituality.

7. Conclusion

7.1 Summary of Findings

This paper affirms the soul as the vital force distinguishing living from dead entities by integrating insights from Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics. Drawing from Vedic philosophy, the Bhagavad Gita presents the soul (Atman) as an eternal, indestructible entity that transcends the physical body. Chapter 2, Verse 20 states, “The soul is never born, nor does it die; it is unborn, eternal, everlasting, and primeval, not slain when the body is slain.” This aligns with the scientific principle of energy conservation, which posits that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed. The parallel suggests that the soul, like energy, persists beyond physical death, providing a metaphysical foundation for its role as the vital force.

Neuroscience, despite its advances in mapping the brain’s functions, struggles to explain the subjective nature of consciousness—often referred to as the “hard problem”—and phenomena such as near-death experiences (NDEs). Research, such as van Lommel et al. (2001), indicates that 18% of cardiac arrest survivors report vivid awareness during periods of minimal brain activity, hinting at consciousness’s potential independence from the physical brain. These gaps in materialist explanations support the possibility of a non-material component, such as the soul, underpinning conscious experience.

Quantum physics further bolsters this hypothesis through theories like Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR), proposed by Penrose and Hameroff. Orch-OR suggests that consciousness emerges from quantum processes within neuronal microtubules, offering a potential mechanism for the soul’s interaction with the physical body. Recent studies, such as Wiest et al. (2024), provide empirical support by demonstrating that drugs targeting microtubules delay unconsciousness, suggesting a quantum basis for awareness. Collectively, these disciplines converge on the idea that the soul is a non-material, indestructible entity that animates life and persists beyond the cessation of bodily functions, challenging reductionist paradigms and enriching our understanding of existence.

7.2 Contributions to Knowledge

By synthesizing Vedic philosophy, neuroscience, and quantum physics, this study offers a holistic framework for understanding the soul, effectively bridging the often-separated domains of science and spirituality. It reimagines the soul not as a purely theological or speculative concept but as a vital force with plausible scientific underpinnings. This interdisciplinary approach fosters dialogue between disparate fields, encouraging scientists and philosophers alike to explore consciousness and existence from a broader perspective. The study contributes to a growing body of research that seeks to address life’s fundamental questions, providing novel insights into the nature of the soul and its role in distinguishing living entities from the dead. This synthesis enhances both scientific inquiry and spiritual discourse, paving the way for a more integrated exploration of human experience.

7.3 Future Research Directions

To further validate and expand the soul theory, future studies should pursue the following directions:

  • Longitudinal Research on Near-Death Experiences (NDEs): Long-term studies tracking individuals who report NDEs could provide robust evidence for the independence of consciousness from the brain. By systematically documenting the consistency, veridicality, and long-term effects of these experiences, researchers may uncover patterns that reinforce the soul’s persistence beyond physical death. Such research could involve follow-ups with survivors of cardiac arrest or other clinical death scenarios to assess the reliability of their accounts over time.
  • Testing Orch-OR through Experiments in Quantum Biology: Empirical investigations in quantum biology could test the Orch-OR theory’s predictions about the role of quantum processes in microtubules. For instance, experiments examining how anesthetics affect quantum coherence in microtubules could validate the theory’s biological plausibility. Positive results would strengthen the case for a quantum mechanism linking the soul to the body, offering a scientific bridge to the study’s philosophical claims.
  • Comparing Cross-Cultural Spiritual Narratives: A comparative analysis of spiritual traditions—such as the Buddhist concept of anatta (no-self), the Egyptian ka (life force), and the Greek psyche (soul)—could identify universal themes about the soul’s nature and role. This cross-cultural approach might reveal shared insights into consciousness’s continuity and its distinction from the physical form, enriching the interdisciplinary framework proposed here. Such studies could employ textual analysis and ethnographic methods to explore these narratives’ implications for the soul hypothesis.

These research directions hold the potential to deepen our understanding of the soul as the vital force, offering empirical and theoretical advancements that could reshape perspectives on life, death, and the human condition.

 

 

 

References

[1] Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.

[2] Brahmacari, Srivas Krishna Das. “Matter and Consciousness in Achintya Bhedābheda: Bridging with Quantum Physics.”

[3] Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 307–321.

[4] Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (1996). Orchestrated objective reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 40(3-4), 453–480.

[5] Brahmacari, D. S. K. D. “Quantum Consciousness: Bridging Science and Spirituality through Vedic Philosophy.” Available SSRN 4843445 (2024).

[6] Prabhupada, A. C. B. S. (1972). Bhagavad Gita As It Is. Bhaktivedanta Book Trust.

[7] Tegmark, M. (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E, 61(4), 4194–4206.

[8] Brahmacari, Sripad Srivas Krishna Das. “: 2025.” Unveiling 54 Vedic Scientists.

[9] Umezawa, H. (1993). Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro, and Thermal Physics. American Institute of Physics.

[10] van Lommel, P., vanWees, R., Meyers, V., & Elfferich, I. (2001). Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: A prospective study in the Netherlands. The Lancet, 358(9298), 2039–2045.

[11] Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. (2013). Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience. Cognition, 127(1), 31–37.

[12] Gita press, Gorakhpur. Garuda Purana.

[13] Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.

[14] Engel, G. S., et al. (2007). Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature, 446(7137), 782-786.

[15] Hameroff, S. (2012). How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 93.

[16] Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39-78.

[17] Kandel, E. R., et al. (2013). Principles of neural science (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

[18] Kelly, E. F., et al. (2007). Irreducible mind: Toward a psychology for the 21st century. Rowman & Littlefield.

[19] Koch, C., et al. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 307-321.

[20] Parnia, S., et al. (2014). AWARE—AWAreness during REsuscitation—A prospective study. Resuscitation, 85(12), 1799-1805.

[21] Ritz, T., et al. (2004). Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass. Nature, 429(6988), 177-180.

[22] Tegmark, M. (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E, 61(4), 4194-4206.

[23] Swami Nikhilananda. (1964). The Upanishads: A New Translation. Harper & Row.

[24] van Lommel, P., van Wees, R., Meyers, V., & Elfferich, I. (2001). Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: A prospective study in the Netherlands. The Lancet, 358(9298), 2039-2046.

[25] Penrose, R., & Hameroff, S. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39-78.

[26] Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200-219.

[27] Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: Progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(5), 307-321.

[28] Preston, J. L., Ritter, R. S., & Hepler, J. (2013). Neuroscience and the soul: Competing explanations for the human experience. Cognition, 127(1), 31-37.

[29] Tegmark, M. (2000). Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E, 61(4), 4194-4206.

[30] Engel, G. S., et al. (2007). Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature, 446(7137), 782-786.

[31] Brahmacari, S. K. D. (2024a). The Vedic Model of the Mind: A Contemporary Exploration. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4935367

[32] Brahmacari, S. K. D. (2024b). Exploring the Cosmic Symphony: Harmonizing Brain Waves and Planetary Frequencies. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4843433

[33] Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: Here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370(1668), 20140167.

[34] Stevenson, I. (1987). Children Who Remember Previous Lives: A Question of Reincarnation. University Press of Virginia.

[35] Swami Gambhirananda. (1983). Katha Upanishad. Advaita Ashrama.

 

YOUR COMMENTS

Views: 91

About Author

Name: Sripad Srivas Krishna Das Brahmacari